2021 Project Achievement and Leadership Award Blog Series: Ohio River Recreational Trail Digital Guide

OKI Regional Council of Governments: Winner of this year’s Project Achievement Awards with their Ohio River Recreational Trail Digital Guide

The Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) developed the Ohio River Digital Guide, an interactive digital map that is designed to aid boaters, paddlers, anglers, cyclists, and motorists to safely explore the Ohio river communities. The guide provides real-time updates of where commercial vessels are and where the barge “sail line” is in the river. In addition to this, the guide includes links to river community websites so travelers can learn about the wonderful amenities that can be found within the river communities.

David Rutter, Senior Planner at the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments  explains just how important this river trail guide is to the region at large and his personal experience with this guide:

My first experience of the Ohio River occurred from the backseat of the family car driving across the Brent Spence Bridge in Cincinnati in the early 80s. We were near the end of a multiday family trip from Texas to my parents’ hometown in central Ohio. From my backseat vantage, I looked out at a brown industrial looking riverfront, not really inviting. Views from bridges pretty much sums up the fullness of my experience of the river for the next several decades whether that was in Pittsburgh, Wheeling, Marietta, or Cincinnati. They all looked very similar, lots of concrete, industry, and very little public access. 

It was not until I moved to Cincinnati in 2016 to work for the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) that I finally got close to the river and began to kayak on it. Tentatively at first, always looking out for barges and motorboats. My love of paddling led to my involvement on the Paddlefest planning team. Paddlefest is an annual event held on the first Saturday of August in Cincinnati, where the Ohio river shuts down to motorized traffic and over 2,000 people paddling nine miles from the East side of Cincinnati to the west side through downtown. It is a great way to see the city skyline and the communities on both sides of the river with the added benefit of not having to watch out for those larger vessels. Proceeds from the event help to support Adventure Crew, whose mission is to get city kids out into nature.  

In 2018 my involvement on the Paddlefest planning team also gave me the opportunity to be part of a team of nine people paddling in a 30-foot voyager canoe straight through from Cincinnati to Louisville, 130 miles in 33 hours. The organizers of the trip were from River City Paddle Sports in Louisville who invited people from the Paddlefest team to join them. I learned a great deal from the seasoned “big river” paddlers on the trip such as the benefit of paddling in as straight a line as possible to reduce the distance traveled and with it the number of strokes required. This involved continual crossing from one side of the river to the other on the diagonal between bends. All of us kept our eyes and ears open for barges in case we needed to make a quick dash towards the nearest shore to avoid being river kill. As we paddled through the night our conversation turned to how we could make it easier for others to experience the river like we were doing.  The seed for the digital guide was planted and the Ohio River Recreation Trail began to germinate. 

OKI supported Paddlefest for years and had recently created an online map that participants in Paddlefest could pull up on their phones to see the route, where they were at, and learn more about some of the things around them by clicking on them. As the Ohio River Recreation Trail planning committee began, we knew we wanted something similar but more robust, a guide that would show the user where they were at, access points, points of interest around them, and most importantly where the barges were located. 

Barges, big seemingly slow-moving juggernauts, easily avoidable so long as one knows where they are. That seems like it should be easy given how big they are but they can be amazingly quiet, especially when coming up from behind or if you are around a bend in the river. More than anything else, fear of the barges seemed to keep people from paddling on the Ohio River. One of the most unique aspects of the digital guide is having real time AIS data showing the location and direction of travel for commercial vessels.  

A few months after our initial paddle from Cincinnati to Louisville, I decided to do a solo trip from Portsmouth, OH to Cincinnati after dropping my oldest off at Ohio University. To plan for the trip, I used the Ohio River Guidebook by Jerry M. Hay since the digital guide was still just an idea. It was helpful but bulky and required me to continually guesstimate my approximate location and how far to my next stopping point. It also did not provide much guidance on things to do, places to see, where to eat, or sleep. So, I rarely stopped to explore the small towns I was passing. Meanwhile I was continually hyper alert for any indication of a barge headed in my direction. Every crossing from one side of the river to the other to take the shortest route involved intense paddling to get out of the shipping lane as quickly as possible.  

In June 2020 we released the digital guide. My first trip out on the river was very different. I still watched and listened closely for barges and other motorized traffic but now I could more confidently decide when it was a good time to cross the river. The real time data allowed me to see around the bends of the river and look several miles up and downstream to anticipate when I would need to be extra cautious as a barge approached. It also helped me know what our river towns have to offer, restaurants and shops, hotels, campgrounds, and marinas. It encourages the user to explore further and conversely for our river towns to keep the data for their communities up to date. Local leaders have been quick to see the potential for the guide to bring people to their communities fueling their economies. 

The digital guide has helped make recreation on the Ohio River safer, at least for the 274 miles between Portsmouth, OH and West Point, KY and helps highlight the unique character of each of the towns along the route while emphasizing their connectedness. It is our hope and aspiration to expand it to the full 981 miles of the Ohio River in the near future.    

Written by David Rutter, Senior Planner, OKI Regional Council of Governments

2021 Project Achievement and Leadership Award Blog Series: A Conversation with Executive Director Becky Bradley

In her over 20 years of regional experience in economic development, historic preservation, and transportation planning in the Lehigh Valley region, Becky Bradley has demonstrated brilliant problem-solving skills and exemplary leadership abilities, and NARC is pleased to recognize her as the recipient of this year’s Walter Scheiber Leadership Award. Prior to her current role as executive director of the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission (LVPC), Becky worked as the Director of Planning, Codes, and Development at the City of Easton, where she helped lead a $500 million revitalization of the community. She brought that experience to LVPC, where, in 2013, she immediately got to work revamping the organization to work more efficiently in the digital age.  

That eye for modernity has also played into Becky’s planning success at LVPC, where she’s managed the success of one of Pennsylvania’s fastest-growing regions while still preserving its historic farmland and natural resources. While there, Becky spearheaded the comprehensive “FutureLV” plan — one of the first programs in the nation to link planning with transportation infrastructure funding — allowing the region to employ its $2.5 billion Long-Range Transportation Plan in its land use recommendations.  

Becky’s achievements in the Lehigh Valley region exemplify the leadership qualities needed to confront future challenges in regional development. To further highlight her tremendous accomplishments, we asked her about her leadership style and the future she sees for regional cooperation.   

1.) What role has regional cooperation played in your successes at LVPC?  

Regional cooperation is exactly what I do every day, it is at the center of everything.  I think I am the proudest of recognizing that having a bi-county comprehensive plan separate from our long-range transportation plan was inefficient, confusing of the community and thwarted policy implementation.  By working with our 37-member bi-county planning commission, the metropolitan planning organization for transportation planning and investment, both Lehigh and Northampton County boards, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and US Department of Transportation as well as, our many, many publics, non-profit and for-profit partners to create a single plan with a $4.3 billion transportation investment plan has been one of the greatest successes on my career.  Through the new FutureLV: The Regional Plan we now have a balanced policy and funding approach to everything from housing and economy to equity and the environment, while positioning the Lehigh Valley for the massive technological and societal changes that are emerging as part of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.              

2.) What lessons have you learned about encouraging people to cooperate on important projects? 

Actively listening to individual needs, seeking out the voices of people who are under-represented and truly building a bigger decision-making table builds the implementation culture needed for success.  No one plans or implements alone and every citizen, business, transit rider, tractor trailer driver, Uber driver, airline pilot, child, adult…all have a roll.  Our lives and our success are intertwined and to be successful we must recognize, honor and invite everyone to the table.  Beyond that, in equity communities we also need to bring the table to them.  We have long consulted with the titans of industry, so we have no excuse but, to ask our underrepresented population, from Moms and Dads to the elderly and the poor to the racially and culturally-under recognized to be a part in our region’s future.  It is everyone’s after all.        

3.) During your time at LVPC, how important has familiarity with the people in your community been in addressing issues?  

It is everything and as the population, economy, transportation systems, housing, educational institutions, governance structured, etc. change so does the familiarity.  You must be a very astute observer of people and of place.  A region’s inherent dynamisms and the compound-complex nature of regional work must be a healthy obsession to be successful.      

4.) What is something you know now that you wish you knew when you first began your career? 

That regional work was a viable career option.  Not once in my K-12 education or in college was regional work ever discussed.  It wasn’t until I pursued a graduate education in City and Regional Planning that I understood the power and logic of working at the metropolitan level.  The regional scale is where most people live their lived and where companies and even small businesses operate.  I am glad I found regional work and with every opportunity to speak to children and young adults I speak about how communities really work, at the metro-scale.      

5.) How has the shape and scope of regional cooperation changed throughout your career?  

The need for a regional mindset is the only way to remain viable as a community in a global economy.  The only way to distribute vaccines or carry people and goods from destination to destination is regional in most cases.  Ten and 20 years ago the mindset was still local or hyper local.  Now everyone knows regional cooperation is needed to remain relevant and to thrive.  Regional cooperation has evolved with society itself and is only rising more quickly now.          

6.) What traits — in both yourself and others — do you think are most important to being an effective community leader? 

The ability to zoom in and out on any given issue by seeing the detail and bringing in many voices to solve problems.  It is both an art and a science.  Effective community leaders see how the past, relates to the present and the future, brings them into a logical, achievable path to move a community forward.  It is the ability to see inter-relationships, communicate them and work all angles of the issues simultaneously.  Effective regional leaders are adept at this and love a good challenge.  Leadership is always intentional, steady, open-minded and willing to evolve.                 

7.) What future role do you see for regionalism in government?  

As local government and even county governments struggle to implement programs the need for support and leadership will only grow.  Especially, technological advancements begin to require strong regional coordination between federal, state and local governments, the private and non-profit sectors.  Electric vehicle charging networks and small cellular technology systems are two perfect examples of this.  The average person does not know what township or even county they are in, they just know they need to get their kids to school or their delivery to the company that will turn it into a finished product.  They know they need to communicate with their husband or their coworker or their client along the way.  The cell service or connectivity better be there in order from them to be successful in whatever tasks they need to do, wherever they need to do them.  It is the nature of the connected, on-demand economy.  It is society now and into the future.  Regional agencies coordinate systems and networks at the scale that is most relevant to our day-to-day lives.  We have a strong future in supporting, coordinating and convening communities as a result.        

8.) How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the way you view your work?  

The COVID-19 Pandemic showed us all systemic vulnerabilities, especially inequities, in decision-making, policies, investments, educational systems, work-life balance, you name it.  In many ways it was a great upheaval and one that I know has fundamentally changed, for the better, how I view community and the need to provide access to opportunity for everyone.  I see this new normal as one of the most exciting and remarkable opportunities to become better people and places.  We have always, as regional councils been able to do the work that others could not, at the scale people needed, but, now more than ever I believe we have a moral obligation to support our communities as they navigate a great unknown.  We can help unravel the uncertainty, provide guidance and support in new ways and make sure that everyone is included.  Our place in this time could not be more important and that obligation is really energizing.          

9.) What impact has coordination with like-minded colleagues had on your own leadership abilities?  

I learn so much from people who work in the regional space.  It is necessary to successful leadership to have string collegial relationships.  I often find that the space where like-minded people come together is where the most exciting and successful problem-solving happens.  We work across regions on transportation system coordination all the time, entering a four-state, eight Metropolitan Planning Organization partnership has allowed us to build trust and work towards common solutions.  Five years ago, the New Jersey Department of Transportation and the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority would not have known who to contact in Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania when Interstate-80 improvements were being planned.  Now we talk, we coordinate, and we partner regularly.  There’s trust and integrity, and our transportation system functions better because of it.  I am a better leader because of the connection which lead to the commitment to coordinate and collaborate.  It is a win-win. 

2021 Project Achievement and Leadership Award Blog Series: NIRPC Report Finds the Proliferation of E-commerce

Pandemic Accelerates Impacts of Online Shopping in Northwest Indiana 

The award-winning NIRPC report finds the proliferation of e-commerce opens new opportunities for the Northwest Indiana region, even as the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated online shopping trends. 

Begun prior to the onset of COVID-19, the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) had already begun to look at the implications of e-commerce trends, given the region’s position on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in the greater Chicago metropolitan area. Little did NIRPC’s staff know at the time how relevant their work would become with the onslaught of the pandemic in the midst of the project, accelerating online shopping trends and the proliferation of deliveries. NIRPC staff quickly pivoted to include current COVID-era data and tailored the report to the reality that these super-charged trends in e-commerce would not be dissipating when the pandemic subsided. 

NIRPC’s report, “E-commerce in Northwest Indiana,” examines changing trends in the region accentuated by these new economic and travel patterns made evident during the coronavirus pandemic. Consumer trends have emerged, allowing planners to forecast land use and economic development needs.  

Slumps in brick-and-mortar retail, increases in freight traffic, and new economic opportunities are just part of data analyzed by NIRPC staff. Among the report’s findings and recommendations, NIRPC planners found a 12% decline in shopping trips in Northwest Indiana between 2008 and 2018, the closure of nearly 28% of consumer electronics stores, and growth of nearly 40% in urban freight delivery. City streets and highway traffic are particularly impacted. Transportation and warehousing make up 17.6% of the economy in Northwest Indiana – a higher percentage than Indianapolis – with warehousing and storage employment increasing 50% in just two years. After analyzing the data, planners identified areas in the Northwest Indiana region that were best suited for development for e-commerce-related business activity, based on proximity to municipalities, major highways, and other factors.  

The report offers recommendations for the region’s municipalities and businesses to allocate resources, plan land use and zoning for changing economic needs, anticipate the development of distribution facilities, and incorporate best practices to adjust to increased last-mile delivery and freight traffic.  It also offers recommendations for businesses planning to develop in Northwest Indiana as well as for existing businesses adjusting to a post-pandemic economy.   

These practical strategies include recommendations in the creation of loading zones to mitigate issues like double-parking that impedes the flow of traffic, maintaining delivery trucks safety in residential areas, and shifting toward Automated Vehicle (AV) trucks to relieve congestion.  Land use and retail recommendations suggest rezoning and rethinking for adaptive reuse, repurposing large vacant retail buildings, sensibly locating warehouses and distribution centers, incentivizing smart buildings, considering experimental retail, and redesigning large surface parking of vacant retail.  Further, the study points to next steps to develop sub-area plans that address transportation improvements and accessibility; establish redevelopment/reuse plans on the local level to provide the best possible solutions to repurpose vacant major retail; develop a regional real estate market outlook for warehouses, fulfilment centers, and logistics; and work with intermodal facilities and freight carriers to identify locations with high levels of freight movement to alleviate freight-related congestion. 

The various analyses NIRPC developed are now being made available to be adapted to other regional and local planning efforts as a means of improving planning capabilities. The report used a travel demand modeling cluster analysis that shows the congestion impacts on the transportation network of a potential newly constructed warehouse or distribution center employing 1,000 people, with clusters varying depending on which geographic site is chosen. The traffic model was based on traffic, population, employment, and land-use data to ensure that e-commerce-related facilities are suitable to other land uses in spatial relation to schools, residential areas, transportation hubs, and other uses.  

While brick-and-mortar stores are not going away – and rumors of a “retail apocalypse,” by most accounts, have been greatly exaggerated – the rapid growth of online shopping has created shifts in the way the region’s residents live, and shopping patterns will continue to change. The report acknowledges this has had a significant impact on the region’s retail sector and will have long-term implications for the way the region uses its land and highways. The pandemic has only accelerated what was already a growing trend in Northwest Indiana, and municipalities and counties within the region can use the insights from the report to make critical decisions for their communities, considering the best strategies for economic growth and quality-of-life. 

The report was approved by the NIRPC commission on November 19, 2020, and was primarily authored by NIRPC staff members Eman Ibrahim, Peter Kimball, Kevin Polette, and Scott Weber.  

NIRPC is the Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties in Northwest Indiana. Working collaboratively across the region, NIRPC coordinates regional comprehensive planning and programming for transportation, economic development, and environmental policy. 

Read the full report, “E-commerce in Northwest Indiana”: https://www.nirpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/E-Commerce-in-NWI.pdf  

Written by Tyson Warner, Executive Director of Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission   

2021 Project Achievement and Leadership Award Blog Series: A Conversation with the Honorable Oliver G. Gilbert III

For his tremendous leadership abilities and continued success working on transportation projects in the Miami-Dade area, NARC is pleased to recognize the Honorable Oliver G. Gilbert III as the recipient of the 2021 Tom Bradley Leadership Award. Chairman Gilbert has served the Miami-Dade area in a number of capacities, including as the Vice Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and the Chair for the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), the Southeast Florida Transportation Council (SEFTC), and Vice Chair of the South Florida Regional Planning Councill. During his time at the Miami-Dade TPO, Chairman Gilbert oversaw the passage of 50 transportation planning-related resolutions during 2020 — resolutions that advanced critical projects and promoted access to multimodal transportation for residents and visitors.  

 Chairman Gilbert has been a champion of regional cooperation throughout his time working in the Miami-Dade area. Under his leadership, the SEFTC adopted the 2045 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a collaboration between Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties that aims to provide resilient and equitable transport across southeastern Florida. This RTP will help proactively address the transportation needs of a growing region and further integrate the industries that allow local communities to thrive. To meet the crisis of the pandemic, Chairman Gilbert also oversaw the approval of a study investigating telecommuting as a means of reducing congestion and improving mobility within Miami-Dade County. The study resulted in the creation of a pilot program that aims to maximize telecommuting opportunities and recommend policies for implementation.  

To further highlight the tremendous work done throughout the Miami-Dade region, we asked Chairman Gilbert about his leadership style and the role he sees for regionalism in government — both today and in the future.   

1.) What role has regional cooperation played in your successes with the Miami-Dade TPO? 

As the second-term Chairman for both the Miami-Dade TPO Governing Board, as well as the Southeast Florida Transportation Council (SEFTC), regional cooperation has been key to the success of the Miami-Dade Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan/SMART Region. We have created SEFTC as a  forum where we engage to address regional issues and implement policy in a collaborative manner with agencies across southeast Florida.  The SEFTC is comprised of the membership from the Miami-Dade TPO, Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency (TPA), all within the U.S. Census designated Miami Urbanized area.  

Our region is currently collaborating on strategies for mass transit that will enable us to sustain growth and address issues of sea-level rise and housing. The goal is for long-term sustainability in the southeast Florida region, which is a key component to position Florida as a major global competitor.  

2.) What lessons have you learned about encouraging people to cooperate on important projects? 

I have learned that the public is a key partner for our regional projects to be successful. Through the development and adoption of our 2045 Regional Transportation Plan, we have ensured community engagement and strong stakeholder partnerships. The 2045 Regional Transportation Plan created one regional voice in support of a resilient and equitable transportation for the region’s residents, businesses, visitors, and economic growth. This plan identifies the most significant transportation investments needed for future growth and demand throughout the southeast Florida region. 

3.) During your time at the Miami-Dade TPO, how important has familiarity with the people in your community been in addressing issues?  

Through the transportation planning process, we are constantly engaging the public and community stakeholders, which has been key in gaining consensus to advance the region’s transportation priorities. Familiarity with the core needs of our community regarding transportation, workforce housing, economic development, education, and special needs has helped us understand the diverse views and perspectives, which in turn forms the basis of a successful planning and decision-making process.  

4.) What is something you know now that you wish you knew when you first began your career?  

I wish I knew that the box is imaginary. We hear the phrase “think outside the box”. In most instances, the box is a social norm that we created, that we use to limit our ability to change. We are limited by the laws of physics, everything else is changeable.  

5.) How has the shape and scope of regional cooperation changed throughout your career?  

Regional cooperation has evolved throughout my career from basic agreements to regional consensus and collaboration between counties and governmental agencies. Today, we function as a unified region with strong collaborative partnerships.  

6.) What traits — in both yourself and others — do you think are most important to being an effective community leader? 

I believe creativity and resilience are important traits that allow me, and others, to think outside the box to effect change and bring innovation to our region. As a community leader and Chair of the TPO Governing Board, collaboration is a key element to build a common vision and advance our transportation priorities. We always embrace different and diverse perspectives on our board, which opens us up to new possibilities and allows us to advance our priorities and work with the community. It has been critical to move forward with our Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit Plan (SMART) which has enabled to directly address the region’s mobility needs for today and the future.  

7.) What future role do you see for regionalism in government?   

Regional collaboration is important to address complex regional issues that affect millions of citizens, including transportation and mobility, safety, and economic development. There is a necessity to promote strategies that will lead to efficient, effective, and consistent regional collaboration. Given our region’s expected growth, we continued to proactively explore partnerships in transportation funding as well as working across boundaries. Through our coordinated long-range planning efforts, we have made great strides in identifying policies, transportation facilities, and services that will strengthen our region and the competitiveness of our nation on the global level.  

8.) How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the way you view your work?  

In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped daily life, making significant changes in how people operated. While the pandemic presented a range of challenges, it also presented opportunities to showcase resilience. The Miami-Dade TPO Governing Board is aware that we need to be at the forefront of how we address traffic and congestion in our region, and how we respond to any crisis that come our way. Telecommuting is one example of that resilience, reflected in a growing trend in many industries, to comply with social distancing guidelines.  

In mid-summer 2020, the TPO Governing Board approved a study focusing on the concept of telecommuting as part of a long-term overall strategy to reduce congestion and improve mobility in Miami-Dade County. We worked collaboratively with our partners to complete the most comprehensive study to date regarding telecommuting to understand trends and the possibility of telecommuting as a traffic mitigation strategy to “flatten the congestion curve” post-COVID-19.  

A significant outcome of the study is the advancement of a series of policy actions, including a Pilot Telecommuting Program. We have partnered with the South Florida Commuter Services to implement the program. 

9.) What impact has coordination with like-minded colleagues had on your own leadership abilities?  

Collaboration with our partners at the national, state, regional, and local levels has afforded us the opportunity to adapt to critical changes. During COVID-19, our priority was to continue providing vital, safe, seamless, and reliable travel across modes within our southeast Florida jurisdictions. In these unparalleled times we must have a sense of urgency to transition our future to be more economically and environmentally resilient. We will be successful if we can achieve this together. 

2021 Project Achievement and Leadership Award Blog Series: MORPC and ARC’s Racial Equity Conversation Series

With each new year comes the excitement of hope and promise, but for many of us, last year proved to be one of the most challenging times in our lives.  By March 2020, the world was essentially locked down because of the paralyzing effects of COVID-19. However, nothing could have prepared many of us for the events that happened on May 25 with the murder of a young Black man in Minneapolis named George Floyd.  

Leading up to the death of George Floyd were the killings of Breonna Taylor at the hands of law enforcement and Ahmaud Arbery by vigilantes. For many of us in the Black community, these deaths had become far too common and too many to keep count of, but something changed on the day George Floyd was killed. In the hours following his death, a video captured by a 17-year-old girl chronicling the last hours of Mr. Floyd’s life ignited a social and racial justice movement that would transform not only America but would inspire protests across the world in response, demanding an end to the killings of Black people. 

For me and others, seeing Derek Chauvin — a white Minneapolis police officer who was sworn to project and serve — kneel on a black man’s neck for nine minutes and forty-six seconds, with his hand in his pocket and showing no emotion while Mr. Floyd begged for the last moments of his life, broke my heart and angered my soul. It displayed the inhumane treatment many people in my community face at the hands of law enforcement. The video of Mr. Floyd’s murder, along with the deaths of Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and countless others, along with the disparities exposed by COVID-19 were just too much for many of us to bear. By the summer of 2020, protests about the killings of Black people had reached a scale not seen since 1968 after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  

One July afternoon, two friends, Doug Hooker of the Atlanta Regional Council and William Murdock of the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Council, were sharing their observations and feelings about the civil unrest that was occurring across the nation and the world. They shared their concerns about the lack of proactive leadership in their regions in addressing the issues at hand. The two gentlemen resolved to continue the conversation and wondered if their colleagues across the region shared similar concerns. They began conversations with other leaders across the nation to gauge their level of interest in discussing racial injustice. So, what began as a conversation between two friends, evolved into a six-week conversation series on race and equity. 

To help facilitate this journey, Doug and William enlisted the help of John Hammond from ARC and myself. During our first session, we set ground rules and expectations. To participate in the full conversation series, everyone needed to commit to attending the first session. In thinking about the structure, we wanted to create a safe space for participants, one free from judgment, where individuals were empowered to be their authentic selves. Guiding principles were established to help facilitate the conversation.   

We began the series by examining race in the context of our personal journeys, leading to how race is manifested in our prospective regions, then how race is threaded throughout the planning profession, and finally, how we can be a catalyst of change in our communities to facilitate racial equity in our regions. The result of the series led to the creation of a resource guide to help continue the conversation about race and equity in our communities. 

Admittedly, when we first embarked on this conversation journey, I was uncertain of what the outcome would be because oftentimes discussions about race are uncomfortable to have, particularly among people who do not share my same experiences. But much to my surprise, there was an eagerness among leaders across the nation to discuss race, inclusion, and equity. It was so encouraging to hear leaders from all races, backgrounds, and ethnicities share their personal stories about race and to be transparent in discussing the history of their own community’s impact on today’s inequities. Even more encouraging was a willingness to share best practices and potential solutions for change.  

Since the launch of this series, we’ve been able to continue the conversation through the newly formed Diversity, Equity and Inclusion work group. Through this effort, NARC was instrumental in bringing DE&I officers from various regional councils and MPO’s across the country to discuss issues of race and equity in their regions.  

We know that in order to heal as a nation and right the wrongs of our ugly past, it will be critical for us to continue these conversations to inspire change that is needed to plan for a more equitable future for everyone.  

 

Blog Submission:
This blog post was written and submitted by Níel Jurist, Director of Communications & Engagement at the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission on behalf of MORPC and ARC. 

Pioneer Valley Planning Commission’s Kim Robinson Testifies before the House Committee on Financial Services on CDBG Funding

Last Wednesday, the House Subcommittee on Housing, Community Development and Insurance held a hearing on the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and its impact on addressing local challenges. Kimberly Robinson, Executive Director of the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission (PVPC) testified on behalf of the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC).  Robinson was joined by Joseph Jaroscak, an analyst in Economic Development Policy at the Congressional Research Service; George Mensah, Director of the Miami, Florida, Department of Housing and Community Development; San Francisco Mayor London Breed; and Salim Furth, a Senior Research Fellow at George Mason University’s Mercatus Center.

CDBG has long been a critical source of funding for local projects that address poverty and inequality, especially through economic development and infrastructure programs. Regional councils often help to organize these efforts by providing technical support to communities who seek CDBG funding. PVPC, for example, both applies for and administers CDBG grants for member communities, while also facilitating cooperation between members in order to increase the amount of funding received and improve its efficiency.

While CDBG remains successful in its ability to provide for lower- and middle-income communities, shortfalls in funding over the last two decades have hampered the program’s ability to confront the economic development needs of the communities it serves. Robinson emphasized this point in her testimony, pointing to how CDBG’s funding of $3.44 billion in FY2021 is nearly $1 billion less than it was in 2004. Further, she pointed out that if the original allocation from 1975 were adjusted for inflation, funding for CDBG would exceed $10 billion today.

In her testimony, Robinson also highlighted how, although 70 percent of federal CDBG funds are allocated to larger entitlement communities — defined as principal cities of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, other metropolitan cities with populations exceeding 50,000, and qualified urban counties with populations exceeding 200,000 — the remaining 30 percent allocated to states is still crucial to the development of smaller communities, and CDBG thus cannot be viewed as just a “big city” program. As an example, she pointed to how PVPC aided 19 different communities with CDBG funding in FY2019, despite having just four members that qualify as entitlement communities.

Following the testimonies, Democratic Representative Joyce Beatty (OH-3) asked about how CDBG helps support affordable housing. Robinson responded by articulating how, although the funding cannot be used to construct new housing, it allows PVPC to undergo rehabilitation projects that keep vulnerable people — especially the elderly — in their homes. Representatives from both parties, as well as several of the witnesses, agreed that CDBG funds should not be prevented from going toward new construction and that restrictive zoning barriers limiting their effectiveness should be lifted.

Broadly speaking, there was bipartisan momentum at the hearing toward reforming the formulas used in CDBG allocation. While Democrats, including Chairman Cleaver, praised the flexibility of CDBG and supported increasing its funding in addition to reforming allocations, Republicans seemed hesitant to spend more on the program. Overall, discussion at the hearing suggested an increase in funding for CDBG is unlikely. However, restructuring the program to better serve non-entitlement communities and contribute more to affordable housing, without compromising flexibility appears to be a more attainable goal for the subcommittee.

Southern California Association of Governments adopts Racial Equity Early Action

The following is a Regions Lead guest post by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG):

The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which serves as the metropolitan planning organization for nearly 19 million people – the largest metropolitan planning organization in the nation – adopted its first-ever Racial Equity Early Action Plan. This document will guide and sustain SCAG’s regional leadership in service of equity and social justice.

As in many other regions and communities that shifted attention to equity in summer 2020, SCAG’s Regional Council adopted a resolution affirming SCAG’s commitment to work in partnership with others to close the gap of racial injustice and meaningfully advance justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. As a result, an ad hoc Special Committee on Equity and Social Justice was tasked with recommending a set of policies to the Regional Council and any necessary changes to the bylaws to the General Assembly to help SCAG meet these objectives.

The Racial Equity Early Action Plan was a critical step in ensuring SCAG’s equity-related work continues to advance and endure for years to come. The Early Action Plan details SCAG’s definition of equity and establishes goals, strategies, and a set of “early actions” to advance racial equity through SCAG’s policies, practices and activities. The Early Action Plan is a “living document,” with opportunities to identify new actions over time. The four overarching goals include:

  1. Shift the Organizational Culture, which is focused on SCAG’s internal work and practices.
  2. Center Racial Equity in Regional Policy & Planning, which refers to SCAG’s regional planning functions.
  3. Encourage Racial Equity in Local Planning Practices, referring to how SCAG can influence the local elected officials and planning professionals with which it works and partners.
  4. Activate and Amplify, in which SCAG commits to communicating more broadly its commitment to racial equity and joining with others in different fields and sectors to amplify impact.

Each of these goals is advanced through a focus on the following three strategies:

  • Listen & Learn – Develop a shared understanding of our history of discrimination and the structural barriers that continue to perpetuate the inequities experienced today.
  • Engage & Co-Power – Create an environment where everyone is included, able to share their experiences, and equipped to talk about racial equity and inequities.
  • Integrate & Institutionalize – Focus on systems change to improve racial equity. Center racial equity in all aspects of work. This involves internal and external systems change.​​

The framework of the Racial Equity Early Action Plan was informed by Equity in the Center’s publication Awake to Woke to Work: Building a Race Equity Culture, which provides insights, tactics and best practices to shift organizational culture and operationalize equity, and by consultation with Mr. Charles Brown of Equitable Cities.

In support of SCAG’s commitment to “early actions,” the General Assembly voted to amend the SCAG Bylaws to include an increase in representation of “communities of concern” in regional policy conversations.  More information on SCAG’s work regarding inclusion, equity, diversity and awareness, including SCAG’s definition of Racial Equity, can be found here.

Seeking a way to meaningfully engage with other metropolitan planning organizations around equity-related work, SCAG formed the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Equity Working Group in December 2020 in response to expressed interest from other agencies on Government Alliance for Racial Equity discussion boards. Since then, the group convened nearly 40 participants from 19 MPOs and 11 states and discussed equity-related performance measurement and monitoring. The MPO Equity Working Group will discuss equity-oriented project prioritization and integrating equity into long-range plans at the upcoming May 14 meeting. For more information, email Courtney Aguirre at aguirre@scag.ca.gov.  

The Post-COVID-19 Workplace – What Employers and Employees Are Thinking About

Now that we are more than one year into the COVID-19 pandemic, there is one thing that is certain: there is no single way to safely bring employees back into the office.

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal reported that only 11 percent of employers in a Conference Board survey expect to require all of their workers to return to the office full time. Employers also indicated that they expect that at least 25 percent of work time will be from home, and whether they decide to bring employees back into the office will depend on perceived safety, vaccination rates, and the comfort of employees returning to the office.

While employers are grappling with how to safely have employees return to the office, employees are also grappling with whether it would be better for them to return to the office or continue to work remotely. Employees appear to believe that if they choose to work from home, they are less likely to be involved in important decisions within the organization, and are likely to be less respected than their colleagues who do return to the office. In fact, employees believe that those who continue to work remotely are less likely to get promoted, more likely to be viewed unfavorably by their bosses, and less likely to have an adequate work-life balance. And across the board, remote workers appear to spend more time in meetings, spend more hours working, and experience burnout more readily than their colleagues who return to the office.

A recent article in Axios@Work noted that the issue is not whether everyone is in the office or everyone is remote. The real issue is when an office splits into two groups: those who come into the office vs. those who stay home. When it does, according to Axios@Work, there are likely to be several groups who are at risk of getting left behind. These include working parents, especially women; those who for various reasons decide to remain home while their colleagues are having in-person meetings; and new hires who miss out on connections with other workers and mentors.

The Harvard Business School has been looking at this issue extensively. In an article entitled “COVID Killed the Traditional Workplace. What Should Companies Do Now?” 13 faculty members offered their perspectives on what the post-pandemic workplace will be like. Employers, they suggested, should consider how much face time at the office is really necessary, have honest conversations with employees about their perspectives on returning to the office, weigh the risks of loneliness associated with remote work, consider a flexible hybrid approach, be honest about the company’s needs, keep talking about caregiving obligations, show compassion amid the stress that employees are feeling especially those with family responsibilities including school-age children who would normally be in the classroom, be sensitive to trauma and burnout – an increasingly common occurrence among those working remotely, lead with empathy and understanding, prove that the work space is healthy, make work inspiring whether in or out of the office, and be fair when deciding who returns to the office and who works remotely. Employers would do well to remember, one faculty member suggested, that when employees work from home, productivity actually goes up. Commute times disappear, operational costs get slashed, and employers can tap talent from other cities, states or even countries.

In a recent NARC-sponsored webinar, four regional council executive directors[1] offered their perspectives on the post-pandemic workplace. One year into the pandemic, three of the four indicated that, like most employers, they are grappling with how to safely reopen or keep their offices open. While they noted that productivity has not been an issue – staff are doing great work when working remotely – there remain benefits to both. In-person office work brings people together and closer to the decision-making process, but remote work is contributing to gender equity and overall climate improvements.

No matter when or how offices are opened, these directors indicated that the goal must always be to, first and foremost, keep people healthy and safe and, secondarily, accommodate family needs. They also said that while they cannot compel employees to get the Covid-19 vaccine, they have been expressing strong support for their staff doing so.

One of the most difficult decisions they will have to make is how and when to bring their boards back to the office for in-person meetings. All indicated that they are using technology as best as they can, but also acknowledged that it is not perfect. The willingness of board members to get vaccinated varied greatly by region, but what did not, was the desire of boards to return to in-person meetings where they can have the benefit of socializing.

Travel is another significant issue. It is either being prohibited for now or dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Travel in general, however, is nowhere near back to normal and probably will not be for some time.

So where does this leave us? Actually, it leaves us with few definitive answers, and a lot of questions yet to be answered. But what it does make clear is that there have been some real advantages to remote working that have contributed to a more productive and equitable workplace. NARC is committed to hosting an ongoing conversation with members on the post-COVID-19 workplace and we anticipate that the webinar we just held will be the beginning of a series of webinars and articles that will assist executive directors make sound, realistic, and safe decisions.

  • [1] Kristina Egan, Executive Director, Greater Portland Council of Governments, Portland, Maine
  • Brian Martin, Executive Director, Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission, Dayton, Ohio
  • Mike Eastland, Executive Director, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Dallas/Fort Wayne, Texas
  • Miriam Gallow-Wiles, Executive Director, Southwest Colorado Council of Governments, Durango, Colorado

Support the FCC Emergency Broadband Benefit Program!

The National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) recently became an outreach partner for the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Emergency Broadband Benefit Program (EBBP). The Emergency Broadband Benefit is a program to help households struggling to pay for internet service during the pandemic. This new benefit will connect eligible households to jobs, critical healthcare services, and virtual classrooms. EBBP will provide a discount of up to $50 per month towards broadband service for eligible households and up to $75 per month for households on Tribal lands. Eligible households can also receive a one-time discount of up to $100 to purchase a laptop, desktop computer, or tablet from participating providers if they contribute $10-$50 toward the purchase price. The Emergency Broadband Benefit is limited to one monthly service discount and one device discount per household.

Here are some answers to some of the most common questions about EBBP:

Who Is Eligible for the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program?

A household is eligible if one member of the household:

  • Receives benefits under the free and reduced-price school lunch program or the school breakfast program, including through the US Department of Agriculture Community Eligibility Provision, or did so in the 2019-2020 school year;
  • Received a Federal Pell Grant during the current award year;
  • Experienced a substantial loss of income since February 29, 2020 and the household had a total income in 2020 below $99,000 for single filers and $198,000 for joint filers;
  • Meets the eligibility criteria for a participating providers’ existing low-income or COVID-19 program; or
  • Qualifies for the Lifeline program or participates in one of the following federal assistance programs:
    • Medicaid
    • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
    • Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
    • Federal Public Housing Assistance
    • Veterans and Survivors Pension Benefit; or
    • A household’s income is at or below 135% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of that size.

How Do EBBP-Eligible Households Enroll?

If a household is already a Lifeline participant, they will not need to apply for EBBP or provide any new documents to prove eligibility. Applicants only need to opt-in to a plan provided by their current broadband provider or request enrollment in the program. Current Lifeline subscribers can keep their current Lifeline benefit while also adding a plan that is offered through the EBBP.  People who are not currently participating in Lifeline must apply for the EBBP through the National Lifeline Verifier.

When Can EBBP-Eligible Households Apply?

The FCC has not set a date for enrollment to begin. However, enrollment is expected to start by May 2021. The enrollment period is required to close six months after the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that the pandemic emergency is over or when the $3.2 billion appropriated by Congress has been exhausted, whichever occurs first.

Who are Emergency Broadband Benefit Providers and Where can I Find them?

The FCC recently unveiled a downloadable data table consisting of all broadband providers who have elected to participate in EBBP. The list will be updated as more providers join the program. Individuals can search by state for fixed broadband services and mobile broadband services. Fixed broadband services are provided to your home, or a single location. These include cable, fiber optic, DSL, satellite, and fixed wireless services. Mobile broadband services are device-based and available throughout the service provider’s cellular coverage area, similar to cell phone services.

The National Association of Regional Councils will offer support and information to regional and local communities to help the FCC mobilize people and organizations and share important consumer information about the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program. To learn more about the FCC’s Emergency Broadband Benefit Program, please check out the resources provided by our national partners at the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) and Next Century Cities (NCC).

Regions Protecting the Nation’s Infrastructure from Electromagnetic Disturbances

An innovative collaboration among federal, public and private entities has come together in the San Antonio, Texas region to form a defense-based public-private/private-public sector partnership (P4) designed to protect a military installation, public and private infrastructure, essential government services and private sector businesses from the danger posed by natural and man-made electromagnetic disturbances.

Why the focus on natural and man-made electromagnetic disturbances? The answer lies in the significant damage a solar flare or man-made electromagnetic disturbance can have on a wide range of public and private services such as mobile and emergency management communications, the electric grid, water and waste treatment facilities, internet access, manufacturing, oil and gas pipelines, and the security of city and county records like voting and tax records, in addition to all things military.

Growing out of the work being done at Joint Base San Antonio, this collaboration enjoys the support of local elected officials, the business community, and of course the military. By itself, this would be a unique undertaking, but what makes this effort so unique is the way this P4 emerged with the Alamo Area Council of Governments, (AACOG) serving as facilitator and convener of this effort to bring together local governments, local and national businesses, and the military.

First, a word about electromagnetic disturbances. These disturbances are generally the result of sunspot activity. The sun spews out electromagnetic radiation: the radiation is attracted to earth by our magnetic poles; and in some rare instances these disturbances can disrupt public and private sector activities like those mentioned above. But if the chances of this happening are small why the concern? Because the possibility for what is called high altitude electromagnetic disturbances is likely to be a part of the arsenal our military or economic adversaries might use.

As we have become abundantly aware, cyberattacks on the public and private sectors have become routine. In part, this is being done to disrupt our economy and in part, to undermine the federal, state and local governments of the United State. In February of this year, for example, North Korean hackers attempted to break into Pfizer Pharmaceuticals computer systems Pfizer to steal information on the work Pfizer was doing around vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. In December 2020, multiple private firms were breached by Russian hackers who compromised the software provider SolarWinds and exploited their access to monitor internal operations. Also, in December 2020, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISAS) and the FBI announced that U.S. think tanks focusing on national security and international affairs were being targeted by state-sponsored hacking groups. At the same time, Russian hackers were targeting numerous federal agencies to attempt to gain access to confidential and classified information. In 2016 Russian hackers attempted to disrupt the presidential campaign by hacking the emails of then candidate Hillary Clinton and her campaign chair, John Podesta.

A more effective and expansive approach to disrupting the public and private sectors would be what experts call a High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse that could literally shut down the US infrastructure including the electric grid, communications, gas and oil pipelines, manufacturing and any other activities reliant on computers, information technology, and virtual reality.

The mission of this project has been creating a resiliency model that can ensure that JBSA’s and the region’s public and private sectors can continue to operate after an electromagnetic pulse that will be made available across the nation through military bases. A sign of the importance of this effort is the fact that 80 different organizations within the San Antonio region have joined this effort. Speaking about the project, Diane Rath, AACOG’s director said, “We are very excited about developing the model that is going to be used around the country.”

JSBA and the San Antonio region will continue to serve as the “test” site for this effort, but opportunities to implement this program in other regions with the aid of JBSA is happening now as well.  Most recently a regional council in New Mexico requested assistance creating their own resiliency program, and presentations have been made to other regional councils in various states.

For additional information please contact Neil Bomberg, NARC’s senior policy advisor, at 202 255 2704. He will assist you in reaching out to JBSA. You may also want to reach out directly to Diane Rath, AACOG’s executive director at DRath@aacog.com.

In addition, you will find more information by watching a presentation (beginning at 21:45 by the program’s leaders: Michael “Apollo” Lovell, Executive Director, Joint Base San Antonio Electromagnetic Defense Initiative and Lt. Col. Eddie “Thumper” Stamper, United States Airforce, Mission Director, Joint Base San Antonio – Electromagnetic Defense Initiative.