Now is the time to let your senators and representatives know that you oppose elimination of the SALT deduction and that they should vote against any tax proposal that would do this.<\/p>\n
Over the next weeks and months, Congress will be debating legislation to \u201creform\u201d the nation\u2019s tax system. That debate will focus on many things, including corporate taxes, inheritance tax, individual tax brackets, and charitable tax deductions, among others. But none of the debates may prove as important to states, counties, cities, and towns as the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which allows individuals and households to deduct what they pay to states and localities in the form of income, property, and sales taxes from their federal returns. Both the House and Senate are prepared to eliminate some or all of the SALT deduction to make up for revenue losses resulting from proposed cuts to the corporate and individual tax rates.<\/p>\n
The Tax Policy Center estimates that 30 percent of taxpaying households \u2013 about 39 million — take the SALT deduction each year.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n These taxes are equally important to the states and localities that collect them. <\/em>With these funds states and local governments can pay for the services we want and demand, and often take for granted.<\/p>\n These taxes are important to the federal government. <\/em><\/p>\n Four hundred twenty-five billion dollars of the $2.3 trillion that is collected by states and localities each year from taxpayers and the federal government is spent on infrastructure \u2013 roads, bridges, water treatment plants, and critical buildings like schools and hospitals, to name just a few.[1]<\/a><\/p>\n These investments by state and local governments are so significant that overall, the federal government contributes only 23 percent of all the funds spent on infrastructure. Without these state and local funds, the cost to the federal government of building and maintaining our infrastructure would be considerably greater.<\/p>\n According to the National Association of Counties (NACo), state and local governments deploy revenues from state and local property, income, and sales taxes to finance . . . local law enforcement, emergency services, education, and many other services[2]<\/a> in addition to those used for infrastructure.<\/p>\n Without these funds millions of miles of roads and bridges, mass transit systems, schools, libraries, hospitals, and nursing homes would not be built. Residents might not have access to the goods and services that they currently do, because the resources needed to pay for these services might not exist.<\/p>\n The deduction also reflects the historic belief that individuals should not be taxed twice \u2013 at the state and local level and again at the federal level. Moreover, it would shift the intergovernmental balance of taxation and limit state and local control of our tax system, according to NACo.<\/p>\n But now that deduction is under attack. House and Senate Republicans have incorporated into their budget blueprints a plan to eliminate some or all of the SALT deduction, something that could have devastating impacts on states, counties, cities, and the residents who live there.<\/p>\n Eliminating the state and local tax deduction would subject a larger share of taxpayers\u2019 itemized income to federal taxation by adding back in the local taxes already paid as taxable income. It would also put acute pressure on state and local governments to reduce their taxes dramatically. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that if the SALT deduction is eliminated New York State \u201cwill be destroyed\u201d because of that pressure on the state and local governments to reduce or eliminate some taxes. Other high tax states like California and New Jersey will feel the same pressure to reduce taxes from their state and local taxpayers, potentially cutting off major sources of revenue.<\/p>\n SALT benefits the middle class. <\/em><\/p>\n Nearly 87 percent of taxpayers who claim the SALT deduction have an adjusted gross income (AGI) under\u00a0$200,000.<\/p>\n Taxpayers in all 50 states \u2013 in both Democratic and Republican congressional districts \u2013 claim SALT. Of the top 20 highest-SALT congressional districts, 45 percent have Republican representatives.<\/p>\n If Congress eliminates SALT, middle class homeowners will see their taxes increase. Homeowners that make between\u00a0$50,000 and $200,000\u00a0would see an average tax increase of\u00a0$815\u00a0\u2013 even if the standard deduction is doubled.<\/p>\n States and localities generally raise about $2.3 trillion in taxes each year. Of that, $425 billion are used to help pay for roads, transit, education, and public infrastructure. If states and localities reduce their revenue collection and infrastructure spending, the state of America\u2019s crumbling infrastructure would likely get much worse.<\/p>\n State and local taxes pay for a wide range of important services beyond those previously mentioned \u2013 they also pay for higher education, public welfare, and public safety.<\/p>\n If states and localities are forced to reduce their taxes, many community services will be reduced or eliminated. Above all, families and individuals across the nation will be likely to experience diminished quality of life.<\/p>\n As efforts to reform the nation\u2019s tax system gain steam, so too must efforts to preserve this vital deduction \u2013 the state and local tax deduction.<\/p>\n Now is the time for elected officials and those that value good government to tell their senators and representatives that eliminating the SALT deduction may lead to significant, long-term damage in our communities \u2013 and ultimately, states, counties and cities will bare that responsibility.<\/p>\n Contact your senator and representative to tell them that while it may be the time for tax reform, it is not the time to eliminate the SALT deduction. For more information see GFOA\u2019s report on revenue losses by congressional district<\/a> and the Big 7\u2019s Americans Against Double Taxation<\/a>.<\/p>\n [1]<\/a> http:\/\/www.taxpolicycenter.org\/briefing-book\/what-breakdown-tax-revenues-among-federal-state-and-local-governments<\/a>Here are the facts<\/em>[3]<\/a><\/h5>\n
More facts<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n
What does this mean?<\/em><\/h5>\n
What can I do?<\/em><\/h5>\n
\n[2]<\/a> www.naco.org<\/a>
\n[3]<\/a> http:\/\/www.americansagainstdoubletaxation.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"